The Trades Union Congress (TUC) hosted a series of focus groups of women union reps and activists, to help us better understand women’s experiences of health and safety in the workplace, their engagement with the safety agenda in their unions, and how the trade union movement can better support them. Unions were invited to circulate notice to member participants from a diversity of backgrounds in order to take part and share their views, to help inform our work.
Women’s health and safety has for many years been somewhat overlooked. The finding of these focus groups aims to put a spotlight on the topic of gender in occupational safety and health.
TUC research shows only 20% of union safety reps are women, despite women making up a majority of union members. If we are to ensure safety reps are more representative of the wider workforce as a whole, we first need to better understand why fewer women are becoming safety reps, and why those who do take on the role step forward. To identify barriers and opportunities, we sought to hear direct from women reps and non-reps.
We know there are health and safety concerns which disproportionately, or exclusively, affect women workers. We also know that traditionally, these issues have often been given less attention. A previous TUC Report on Gender and OSH outlined some of the key issues, with advice for reps: https://www.tuc.org.uk/resource/gender-occupational-safety-and-health
The focus groups sought to better understand how we encourage more women to become safety reps, and which OSH concerns all reps require support from unions on. We brought together: women safety reps, established and new; women union reps with roles other than health and safety; women union activists with no formal rep role.
The focus groups invited participants to share thoughts and experiences, using questions including but not limited to the following:
Focus groups took place remotely online, facilitated by the TUC. Participants were encouraged to express views in confidence, and all contributions are attributed anonymously.
A total of 100 women took part in 10 separate focus groups. Four of these were mixed, but union-specific focus groups were also held with PCS, FBU and RMT, meaning members of those unions are more highly represented in the overall number of participants.
Union |
Participants % |
PCS |
20% |
FBU |
23% |
Unite |
2% |
Unison |
15% |
ASLEF |
2% |
UCU |
4% |
GMB |
6% |
USDAW |
2% |
Community |
6% |
NEU |
4% |
Prospect |
2% |
NASUWT |
2% |
POA |
1% |
RMT |
9% |
Equity |
2% |
The majority of participants (75%) were union health and safety reps, with the remainder holding other union roles or no role.
A wide range of health and safety issues were raised by participants, as well as experiences in the role, with unions, and the types of changes women wanted to see.
Some issues were recurrent, and dominated conversations, with many women from across different unions and sectors sharing concerns as well as ideas for practical actions unions can take. This report will discuss several of these further:
The issue of the menopause is being taken up by more unions (and employers), and some participants gave credit to recent television series which attempted to tackle the stigma. Women reported that employers were often not tackling problems in ways that helped workers, with managers rarely receiving training, and some matters which being ignored or dismissed completely. Some women felt they had to ‘prove’ or demonstrate they are menopausal because they were not being believed.
The main concerns raised in relation to the menopause were:
Women were fainting
Work from my union and TUC is great but hasn’t filtered down to members
In addition to concerns, participants also identified opportunities to support women, involve members and use the menopause as an organising opportunity. Ideas from women participants included:
“It’s a useful and powerful recruitment issue”
Women in sectors where uniforms or personal protective equipment was required reported lack of gender-specific sizing and maternity fit, with ill-fitting items not suitable for women's bodies, and a lack of access when a change of size was required. This is not just a question of comfort of aesthetics: a lack of appropriate PPE was reported to be causing accidents and affecting service delivery.
Other concerns highlighted were:
“When we wear [shorts] they’re tight where they shouldn’t be and loose where they shouldn’t be. And if you’re pregnant you’re just told to get a larger size”
“I asked about pregnancy trousers and they looked at me like I was stupid”
Despite very positive steps by unions in securing provision of menstrual products in lots of workplace, raising the issue on the political stage, and breaking down the stigma around menstrual health in the workplace, there remains widespread concern around lack of access to welfare facilities, products and a lack of support. For example, some participants told how only disabled toilets in one workplace had towels and tampons provided, while another said how they were only available for a fee. We also heard how women with conditions such as endometriosis (which causes very painful periods) were being punished through absence monitoring, considered a form of institutionalised gender discrimination. One women told of her employer failing to make adaptions for her, instead signing her off with stress as it was 'easier'.
Other issues raised included:
Women also spoke about the opportunities for making change and organising on the issue of menstruation. In some cases, unions had provided a box with provisions which had led to management adopting it out of shame.
“They’d rather a short-term fix … it then creates antagonism and resentment from men who say ‘oh she’s off sick again’ - and more stress for us!”
“Once we sign on to a shift, we can’t just pop to the shop for some tampons. We need them on site or we’ll leak”
The ability to be and to feel safe was a concern for many women. This included both while on the job, as well as during journeys to and from the workplace, particularly among those travelling at night-time or in remote areas with a lack of public transport; for example in entertainment and hospitality, or on the railways. Some women reported instances of verbal and physical harassment while working or travelling alone. The main problems identified where:
While stress is universal concern, and always the most commonly cited by safety reps across sectors, there were a number of issues raised by women which appeared to give stress a gendered characteristic, including reasons why women workers were at higher risk of experiencing work-related stress due to factors external to work:
Focus group participants reflected on the role of the union safety rep, and their experience as women. While most were already elected to the post of safety rep and could reflect on their own experiences, some had no familiarity with the safety rep function and were able to share their perspective of what it seemed like from the outside.
When considering how unions might try to encourage more women members to consider the role, there were several barriers discussed:
The role of safety rep, and safety committee meetings, were considered ‘macho’ and a male-dominated space not especially welcoming to women colleagues. Women spoke of a "boys club” of safety reps, convenors, officers, and management:
“I’m the only woman that goes to safety committee meetings… it is intimidating”
“The way the male safety rep was treated was different… I was interrogated about what training I’d done”
“They expect subservience from women and Black people”
Women felt they did not know much about the role of the safety rep and its powers:
Where women were in a workplace which already had a safety rep in post, they have been told there was no need for any additional reps.
Many women felt 'at capacity', and simply had too much else going on to consider taking on additional union duties. There was a perception that it involves a heavy workload burden, and a lack of knowledge of the right to carry out duties in work time.
The perception of being 'pigeonholed' as the union Equalities or Women’s Officer (even when in post as a safety rep!) because of their gender:
Some women felt they were, or would be, listened to less compared to men in similar roles; both by management and members.
There were negative associations with being vocal and adversarial with management, which came with fear of victimisation.
Women also raised difficulty accessing training: the dates, times, and locations of safety rep training made it hard to juggle caring responsibilities
Some women felt the safety rep role was the most 'boring' position in the union, or that it was daunting and involves a lot of legalistic knowledge
A lack of women role models to look up to and learn from meant some women just couldn't see themselves doing it. This was particularly true of younger women:
Despite the challenges identifies, and some of the more negative experiences of women reps and activists, participants identified positive actions and best practise in supporting women members' health and safety and progression in the union.
Members shared examples of their own work, or campaigns they were familiar with, gave positive feedback on resources and training provided to members, and contributed ideas for what unions, reps and the TUC can do going forward. Many of the women safety reps involved were very proud to be a safety rep, of the difference made to members' safety, and the status that came with their union role.
When they see me coming they do take me seriously. They see the union lanyard and know I mean business
Participants spoke repeatedly about mentorship, both formal schemes facilitated by unions, and informal support networks. This involved women safety reps mentoring other women, but also men with experience offering support and guidance, too.
Similarly, there was appetite for more opportunities to informally network with other reps, from similar or different workplaces, sectors and unions, order to share experiences and advice. Many of the women in the focus group said they would like to do something similar again, as it was the first opportunity they'd had to converse in such a way with other women in similar roles.
Building women's confidence was underlined as a key factor in convincing members to take on the rep role, with training on leadership in the union required before training in a specific union role could be considered.
“We had a male safety rep who never brought info back to the branch… so I stood against him and won”
“You cannot guarantee there will be a woman in the room unless you are there”
My manager was offered training. He said ‘I’m not doing it
There were many suggestions about how the trade union movement can better sell the positives of the role of safety rep, including the benefits that come with it in terms of influence, training, the powers the role has, and the time off to carry out duties.
It gives you so much more authority and clout, and you can put a health and safety spin on anything!
You get respect from your members
Members feel more comfortable talking to you than to management
It’s the quickest route to change!
Women felt there was a need for unions to normalise the existence of multiple reps, as opposed to workplaces having a sole union safety rep (which was more often than not a man). It was also felt that this was importance for succession planning: with safety reps often falling into older age brackets, there was a need to target more younger women and ensure several years' overlap/handover, else workplaces risked losing the role altogether.
Once we had two reps the workload was shared and it was much more manageable
The benefits of union and TUC training was repeatedly raised. Access was an important issue, with many saying how the experience of the Covid-19 pandemic and the move to online or hybrid learning had made accessing learning much easier for them. A greater emphasis on part-time, flexible and online learning offers were welcomed. Women also suggested more 'bite size' training offers that give members a taste for the role, but doesn't require fully signing up to the full course, as a lead-in.
I’m quite proud that I’ve got my [rep] qualifications
It’s a positive change. I’m now seeing more women interested in the role
online training has allowed more people to be more involved
Women identified a modular approach to courses as more accessible for women members, with a greater level of flexibility over when or where courses were offered as desirable.
Participants were also interested in seeing course content including more on the health and safety issues faced by women.
Some women suggested that most (or that there is a perception that most) trainers and tutors on union reps courses are men; and that women-only training may encourage some women to take part who might otherwise not feel as confident.
An hour a week over a year is easier for me than six specific days that can’t be moved
Focus group participants had a number of practical ideas to help encourage more women to consider the role of safety rep, including:
People should know what health and safety reps do. It’s not just wandering around in a high-vis!
Want to hear about our latest news and blogs?
Sign up now to get it straight to your inbox
To access the admin area, you will need to setup two-factor authentication (TFA).