The gender pension gap in the UK means that retired women effectively go over four months each year without getting a pension – the equivalent of losing out on £7,600 a year on average.
This means that compared to men, retired women effectively stop receiving pension income from today (Thursday), the TUC warns.
The income gap between men and women in retirement is now 36.5%, according to research from Prospect union - more than double the level of the gender pay gap (currently 13.1%).
Reasons for the gap
The union body says that the main drivers of the gender pensions income gap are:
Lasting solutions
The TUC has highlighted three key solutions for narrowing the gender pension gap for women retiring in the future:
The Pension Commission
Last month, the Government revived the Pension Commission, which will bring together unions, employer and independent experts to look into the causes of the gap, among other issues.
It aims to reach a consensus on long-term changes needed to ensure that millions of people benefit from a more secure retirement – including women.
And where consensus already exists – like calculating pension contributions from the first pound of earnings and bringing more young workers into auto-enrolment – the government should press ahead quickly.
This is a much needed opportunity to ensure that everyone receives a decent retirement income and the gender pension gap is closed.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said:
“Everyone deserves dignity and security in retirement. But right now, too many retired women have been left without enough to get by.
“We must make sure that these inequalities are addressed for future generations.
“That’s why reviving the Pensions Commission - bringing together unions, employers and independent experts - is a vital step forward.
“We now have a chance to make sure everyone, including women, receive the decent retirement income that all workers need.”
Prospect Senior Deputy General Secretary Sue Ferns OBE said:
“The Gender Pension Gap is very slowly moving in the right direction but without a more concerted effort millions of women will continue to suffer from unequal earnings in retirement for much of the rest of this century.
“The first step was the success of Prospect’s campaign for the government to recognise and measure the Gender Pension Gap. The next step is for government to show the way as an employer and take real action to close the gap by adopting trailblazing reforms across all public sector pension schemes.
“That the gender pay gap sits at 14% is unacceptable, for the gender pension gap to be more than twice that is nothing short of disgraceful and shames a society that doesn’t take action.”
TUC report on Gender Pension Gap can be found here.
Prospect union report on Gender Pension Gap can be found here.
Methodology: This analysis was carried out using Labour Force Survey data from Q1 2025. For the people who were economically inactive due to caring responsibilities, we looked at the reasons given by respondents who were not looking for work in the next four weeks. For workers earning less than the auto-enrolment threshold, we looked at employees aged 22-65 who were earning less than £192 a week, compared to all employees in that age group.
Numbers of men and women economically inactive due to caring responsibilities
| Number economically inactive due to caring | Total population | Percentage of population economically inactive due to caring |
Men | 286,459 | 21,597,366 | 1.3% |
Women | 1,501,635 | 22,342,902 | 6.7% |
Total | 1,788,094 | 43,940,268 | 4.1% |
Numbers of men and women economically inactive due to caring responsibilities by age band
Age band | Percentage of male population economically inactive due to caring | Percentage of female population economically inactive due to caring | Number of times more than men that women are likely to be inactive due to caring duties |
16-19yrs | 0.0 | 0.8 | N/a |
20-24yrs | 0.6 | 3.6 | 6.3 |
25-29yrs | 0.5 | 9.0 | 18.7 |
30-34yrs | 1.1 | 9.6 | 9.1 |
35-39yrs | 2.2 | 8.3 | 3.8 |
40-44yrs | 1.0 | 7.8 | 7.7 |
45-49yrs | 1.4 | 6.6 | 4.7 |
50-54yrs | 2.1 | 6.1 | 2.9 |
55-59yrs | 2.1 | 5.9 | 2.9 |
60-65yrs | 1.9 | 7.0 | 3.6 |
Numbers of men and women economically inactive due to caring responsibilities by ethnicity
Ethnicity of respondent | Percentage of male population economically inactive due to caring | Percentage of female population economically inactive due to caring | Number of times more than men that women are likely to be inactive due to caring duties |
White | 1.4 | 6.0 | 4.1 |
BME | 0.8 | 9.8 | 11.7 |
Numbers of men and women economically inactive due to caring responsibilities by disability status
| Percentage of male population economically inactive due to caring | Percentage of female population economically inactive due to caring | Number of times more than men that women are likely to be inactive due to caring duties |
Equality Act Disabled | 2.3 | 9.0 | 3.9 |
Not Equality Act Disabled | 1.1 | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Numbers of men and women below the auto-enrolment (AE) earnings threshold
| Number earning less than the £192 a week AE threshold | Total number of employees | Percentage of employees earning less than the AE threshold |
Male | 321,776 | 13,250,498 | 2.4% |
Female | 1,015,859 | 13,644,893 | 7.4% |
- About the TUC: The Trades Union Congress (TUC) exists to make the working world a better place for everyone. We bring together the 5.5 million working people who make up our 48 member unions. We support unions to grow and thrive, and we stand up for everyone who works for a living.
Want to hear about our latest news and blogs?
Sign up now to get it straight to your inbox
To access the admin area, you will need to setup two-factor authentication (TFA).