The TUC conducted this research to investigate the extent to which the progress of recent decades in embedding formal legal protections for LGBT+ workers has translated into positive and inclusive experiences of the workplace. What we found was worrying: despite LGBT+ workers being protected by law from discrimination, harassment and bullying, too many still experienced the workplace as a negative or even harmful.
This research was qualitative: we wanted to dig beneath the surface of statistics and try to understand the reality of life being out as LGBT+ at work now. We were particularly keen to hear directly from people who are active in their trade unions, in order to help union reps and activists understand the issues and make sure they are ready to support LGBT+ members.
Many of the LGBT+ people we interviewed reflected that they have seen progress - although homophobia and biphobia are by no means extinct in the workplace. The LGBT+ workers we spoke to had low expectations, considering themselves fortunate when basic legal standards are met. It was noticeable that recruitment was a point of particular tension and worry: even those happy to be out in the workplace said they would definitely hide their identity when applying for a new role.
There was consensus among our interviewees that trans and non-binary staff face the greatest challenges in the workplace. Many felt that progress on trans inclusion in the workplace was going backwards. Many interviewees cited the toxic narratives about LGBT+ people that are prevalent in the media, believing that this climate is affecting LGBT+ experiences at work.
From the interviews, it was clear that inclusive workplace policies are necessary but not sufficient to create workplace change, and that culture is slower to improve. Acts of harm are very likely to go unreported to employers as they believe little will be done. Many described discriminatory and bullying experiences such as being outed by colleagues or being persistently misgendered - but said they would be very unlikely to make a complaint.
Overall, interviewees were positive about unions (as you would expect from a sample recruited through union networks with higher union membership than the general population). There was, however, some concern that unions and union reps may not have an up-to-date understanding of gender identity and sexual orientation issues. Some interviewees said that they might not approach their union for support with issues related to being an LGBT+ worker. There were also some examples of historic unsupportive practice by union reps cited.
A number of interviews focussed on the impact of employer-led diversity and inclusion networks (sometimes called LGBT+ networks, employee resource groups or affinity groups). Whilst these are very welcome sources of support and representation, interviewees reflected that these networks are dependent on workplace culture, and time to participate in these networks is not protected. We also note that, unlike unions, employee resource groups and networks exist at the whim of management and do not have an independent status.
The core conclusion of this research was the importance for employers and unions of focusing on building inclusive cultures at work. Managers in all workplaces need to actively, consciously and consistently create inclusive cultures, set behavioural expectations for everyone, and stamp out discrimination and bullying. This will create stronger, more successful organisations, with benefits for customers and clients too.
The TUC wanted to understand the experiences of LGBT+ workers in today’s workplaces, to develop recommendations for both policy change and practical actions that unions could take. We therefore took a qualitative approach, asking LGBT+ workers to answer a screening survey and then approaching a smaller sample to take part in more in-depth interviews.
We conducted 16 interviews. The interviews provided a relatively diverse - though not representative - group of respondents from across the UK, and of different ages, genders, LGBT+ identities, ethnicities, and across a range of job roles and sectors. Interviewees were more likely than the population as a whole to be members of, or reps in a union.
The interviews focused on the following key areas:
It should be noted that those who took part in this research were self-selecting. Those keen to speak to a researcher tend not to be those with the most difficult experiences.
Want to hear about our latest news and blogs?
Sign up now to get it straight to your inbox
To access the admin area, you will need to setup two-factor authentication (TFA).