Global conference on aid effectiveness
TUC letter to DFID Secretary of State
At the end of November, governments will gather in Busan, South Korea, to discuss aid effectiveness. The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is pressing for a conclusion that promotes pro-poor growth and favours working people, and TUC General Secretary has written to Andrew Mitchell, Secretary of State for International Development, urging him to back union arguments for accountable employers and decent work.
Draft outcome document for the fourth high-level forum on aid effectiveness, Busan
The TUC has been alerted by our trade union colleagues in developing countries, through the ITUC, to the current draft of the outcome document from the Busan forum starting at the end of November, and I wanted to express some concerns to you in the hope that you could improve the text, even at this late stage.
In particular, whilst I know that you are personally committed to develop the private sector as a key agent of growth, I hope you will agree that the private sector alone and unregulated is unlikely to deliver the job-rich growth developing and emerging countries need.
I would therefore like to press you to ensure the inclusion in the outcome document of references to a social protection floor, and support for sensible regulation of the private sector on the basis of agreed international standards (ILO, OECD, Ruggie etc). Thus, in the section on the private sector and development, I would want to see language to the effect that private sector growth 'should be promoted, based on the principles and standards of the International Labour Organisation and the other international agreed instruments such as the OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.'
I would also like to see the text stressing more effectively the need for job creation and decent work, something along the lines of: 'economic strategies driven by strong, sustainable and inclusive growth should focus on job creation and fighting unemployment, especially amongst young people and women, and the promotion of decent work to create sustainable livelihoods that generate social and economic stability and development.'
Finally, I hope you will agree that the role of social partners in economic development should be recognised in the text. The ITUC has suggested the text below, and I would be grateful to know whether you could support its inclusion?
Please let me know whether you can support these suggestions, and let me know if you need more information. I would also be happy to help if you think the TUC could use our influence with other trade union movements around the world to assist in getting a good agreement at Busan.
Stressing the essential role of social partners (employers' and workers' organisations) and of social dialogue in addressing inclusive economic and social policies for development, we will
a) recognise the essential role of social partners (employers' and workers' organisations) as engine for economic development and for dynamic and productive labour markets;
b) work with the employers' and workers' organisations to contribute actively to the fight against poverty and social exclusion and to use the benefits of inclusive economic growth for improving livelihoods for the underprivileged, especially women and young people; and
c) promote social dialogue as a cornerstone for democratic ownership in economic and social policy setting, for coordination between social and economic goals, the promotion of full employment and a rights based exit out of informality and under-employment.
Issued: 14 November, 2011