Toggle high contrast
Issue date
• New TUC analysis shows breakdown of employment risk for local authorities in South West
• Figures comes as new TUC report sets out plan to invest for growth to avoid mass unemployment in the region

A new TUC report ‘A better recovery for the South West, published today, sets out a plan to prevent mass unemployment following the pandemic, with secure jobs and decent pay for working families.

The report by the trade union body warns there is a high risk of mass unemployment in the South West if the region does not have a recovery plan centred on protecting and creating jobs, backed by major investment.

This comes as the trade union body publishes their latest analysis on the number of jobs at risk by local authority in the South West region.

Risk of mass unemployment in the South West

Workers who have required support from the job retention scheme and self-employed income support scheme are most likely to face unemployment risks in the months ahead.

In the South West region, TUC analysis estimates at least 878,800 workers (32% of the workforce) have required support from government schemes. And local authorities in the region with the highest proportion of workers seeking support through these schemes are Cornwall, Torbay and Dorset at 37% and 36% respectively.

According to the report, rural and coastal communities with lower average pay and higher insecure employment have been especially affected, thus exposing the cracks in the region’s economy.

On top of these figures, there are many other people who have been laid off or who entered the employment market during the crisis and unable to find work, and are ineligible for the government support schemes.

A plan to get the South West growing out of the crisis. 

The pandemic alone did not cause the current crisis. It was made worse by a decade of deep cuts to local councils and services, and a failure to strengthen the South West economy, says the TUC.

Choosing the wrong approach now risks embedding low growth, long-term unemployment and all the social ills that go alongside.

The report recommends an approach based on recently published TUC research (see notes), which found that the fastest recoveries from economic crises in UK history were based on investment for growth.

An investment for growth approach must be resourced by central government, and will need action at regional level in three key areas:

1. Investing in jobs: Combined authorities, local councils and local enterprise partnerships (LEPs) should work in partnership with trade unions and businesses to:

  • Secure investment for local infrastructure needs
  • Leverage public sector spending to support local jobs and enterprise
  • Develop a regional-level green industrial strategy that builds on the region’s strengths to meet climate targets

2. Decent work and a new way of doing business: Combined authorities, local councils and LEP’s should attach conditions to commissioning and procurement that will improve job quality, strengthen worker voice, increase training opportunities and tackle discrimination and disadvantage in the workplace.
 

3. Rebuilding public services: Combined Authorities and local authorities should adopt a policy of managing all services in-house by default, so they can raise employment and delivery standards, and strengthen the resilience of essential services such as social care.

 

A regional recovery council 

The report calls for the formation of a regional recovery panel with representation from unions, employers, Job Centre Plus, relevant civic partners and local and regional government.

Regional panels would work in tandem with a UK National Recovery Panel to turn headline objectives into tailored strategies for each region.

The TUC says that regional structures with devolved powers are essential to achieving the best recovery possible, because the nature and scale of the challenge varies greatly across different parts of the UK.

Both the regional and national bodies should have worker representation so that workers’ voices are at the heart of decision-making for recovery plans.

TUC regional secretary Nigel Costley said:

“People are very worried about their jobs. Many have been laid off already. And just last week, our unions received dozens of redundancy notifications – with many more expected to come. This situation is only going to get worse unless something is done now.

“Losing your job is a dreadful experience – devastating for families. And devastating for our communities. 

“If we allow mass unemployment to take hold, our economy will be smaller, and the recovery, much slower.

“That’s why investing in good jobs is at the heart of our recovery plan for the South West. Jobs in a reborn manufacturing sector. Jobs in the green tech we need to safeguard our future. More and better jobs in our revived tourism and creative sectors. It’s just common sense.

“And we must value our public services much more than we did before. Because after ten long years of cuts, our key workers found it much harder than it should have been. Our communities will always remember the key workers who kept us going through the crisis. But the people with the power to do more – the politicians - they must not forget.

“This week, we’re asking the Chancellor to put his faith in the people of the South West with big and bold investment. If he backs us in this way, we can avoid mass unemployment, work our way to recovery and build back better.”

Editors note

- Regional and local unemployment risk data by local authority:

 

SEISS

JRS

Total JRS and SEISS

% of in employment on a scheme

% JRS

% on SEISS

South West

224,000

654,800

878,800

32

24

8

Bath and North East Somerset UA

6,700

22,100

28,800

29

22

7

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole UA

15,000

50,000

65,000

31

24

7

Bristol, City of (UA)

17,400

52,400

69,800

28

21

7

Cornwall UA and Isles of Scilly UA

29,000

68,500

97,500

37

26

11

Dorset UA

15,200

43,100

58,300

36

26

9

North Somerset UA

7,600

25,300

32,900

32

24

7

Plymouth UA

8,200

30,400

38,600

30

24

6

South Gloucestershire UA

9,800

32,800

42,600

29

22

7

Swindon UA

7,200

28,000

35,200

31

24

6

Torbay UA

5,900

16,500

22,400

37

27

10

Wiltshire UA

17,300

54,600

71,900

29

22

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Devon County

37,600

90,600

128,200

33

23

10

East Devon

6,400

16,300

22,700

34

24

9

Exeter

4,000

13,800

17,800

25

19

6

Mid Devon

4,000

9,100

13,100

32

22

10

North Devon

5,200

12,100

17,300

36

25

11

South Hams

5,100

9,900

15,000

38

25

13

Teignbridge

6,100

16,200

22,300

36

26

10

Torridge

3,800

7,700

11,500

30

20

10

West Devon

3,000

5,600

8,600

34

22

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gloucestershire County

23,900

76,300

100,200

31

23

7

Cheltenham

4,000

14,500

18,500

29

23

6

Cotswold

3,800

11,200

15,000

34

25

9

Forest of Dean

3,700

10,000

13,700

33

24

9

Gloucester

4,000

16,300

20,300

29

23

6

Stroud

5,100

13,600

18,700

29

21

8

Tewkesbury

3,300

10,700

14,000

32

24

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Somerset County

23,100

64,400

87,500

32

23

8

Mendip

5,600

15,100

20,700

33

24

9

Sedgemoor

4,800

13,300

18,100

29

21

8

Somerset West and Taunton

6,300

17,100

23,400

33

24

9

South Somerset

6,500

18,900

25,400

32

24

8

The analysis is based on claims made of support through the job retention scheme and the self-employed income support scheme. The figures are likely to be an underestimate, as around a million claims have not been assigned a location.

- Mass unemployment: Analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility suggests that the UK unemployment count could reach 3m people as a consequence of the coronavirus crisis

- Evidence in support of investment-led economic recovery: The TUC published research in May 2020 showing that the most successful economic recoveries in the last century of UK history have come from investment-led approaches.

The research compared government expenditure in the decades following significant economic shocks and downturns. It found that during periods like the post-war recovery (1947-57),  investment for growth paid for itself.

This is because millions of working families had higher disposable income through decent work, creating the economic demand needed for strong growth and healthy public finances. And investment in stronger public services meant an effective safety that supported people to start and grow businesses.

The following table summarises the analysis, with explanatory notes below.

 

Annual average

Percentage points of GDP

Rank

Decade

GDP growth, %

Of which government expenditure, ppts

Public debt at start of decade

Change in public debt

1

1931-41

4.5

9.9

181

-21

2

1947-57

3.3

0.5

244

-123

3

1991-2001

2.9

0.3

23

+6

4

1981-91

2.9

0.2

43

-19

5

1975-85

2.3

0.2

54

-15

6

1921-31

1.9

0.0

160

+20

7

2009-19

1.9

0.2

59

+22

- TUC UK national recovery plan: Our regional reports complements the national report that we published in May 2020. The full national report can be found here.

- About the TUC: The Trades Union Congress (TUC) exists to make the working world a better place for everyone. We bring together more than 5.5 million working people who make up our 48 member unions. We support unions to grow and thrive, and we stand up for everyone who works for a living.

Enable Two-Factor Authentication

To access the admin area, you will need to setup two-factor authentication (TFA).

Setup now